What to write – fiction verses non-fiction

The publishing industry can be a challenging and competitive landscape for aspiring authors, particularly in the realm of fiction. A recurring problem that many new fiction authors face is the difficulty in getting selected by traditional publishing houses, while non-fiction authors often find it comparatively easier to secure publishing deals. This discrepancy stems from various factors related to market demands, perceived risks, and the nature of the publishing industry itself.

One key reason for the disparity lies in market trends and reader preferences. Non-fiction books, such as self-help, business, or memoirs, have traditionally enjoyed a steady demand as readers seek knowledge, personal growth, or real-life narratives. Publishers recognize this market stability and tend to be more open to accepting non-fiction proposals that cater to popular niches.

On the other hand, the fiction market is more subjective and volatile. Fiction encompasses a wide range of genres, styles, and themes, making it harder to predict commercial success. Publishers often prioritize established or well-known authors, who have a proven track record and a built-in readership. This cautious approach is driven by the need to minimize financial risks associated with publishing books that may not resonate with a wide audience.

Another contributing factor is the perceived market saturation in fiction. Traditional publishers receive an overwhelming number of fiction manuscripts, making it a highly competitive arena for new authors. The sheer volume of submissions creates a significant challenge for publishers to sift through and select manuscripts that meet their specific criteria and expectations.

Moreover, the publishing industry has undergone significant transformations with the rise of digital technologies and self-publishing platforms. Many authors now choose to bypass traditional publishers altogether, opting for self-publishing or digital publishing options. This shift has led to an increased focus on marketability and platform building, as authors are expected to promote their work and build a readership independently.

Non-fiction authors often possess a distinct advantage in this regard. Many non-fiction proposals come from professionals or experts in their respective fields, who bring credibility and a built-in audience. Publishers are more likely to view these authors as authorities, making their proposals more appealing and marketable.

However, it is essential to note that these observations are not absolute, and there are exceptions to every generalization. Fiction authors do secure traditional publishing deals, and non-fiction authors face challenges as well. The publishing landscape is continually evolving, and factors such as changing market trends, societal interests, and individual author voices can influence the opportunities available to both fiction and non-fiction authors.

In recent years, the rise of independent and small presses has provided alternative avenues for fiction authors to get their work published. Additionally, self-publishing platforms have enabled authors to have more control over their creative work and reach readers directly. These developments have democratized the publishing process to some extent, offering authors more options beyond traditional publishers.

In conclusion, the problem of new fiction authors struggling to be selected by traditional publishers compared to the relative ease experienced by non-fiction authors stems from market demands, perceived risks, and the subjective nature of the fiction market. However, the publishing industry continues to evolve, and alternative paths are emerging, providing authors with diverse options to share their stories with the world.